<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meaningfulless; Meaningfulmore.</title>
	<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/</link>
	<description>simplicity resources for design, business, technology, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: iamdoofus</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7466</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7466</guid>
					<description>thought provoking
i suggest a new stickie for ponderance
&quot;nonetheless&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thought provoking<br />
i suggest a new stickie for ponderance<br />
&#8220;nonetheless&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grant Czerepak</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7337</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7337</guid>
					<description>I find this post interesting because of something I encountered while teaching English in university.  In preparing students for composition I explained to them it is better to do more research than required, because it is easier to write down to an acceptable essay than up to it.

In &quot;The Innovator's Dilemma&quot; the author, Christensen, lays out four steps that a product evolves through.  First, it is conceptual, a possibility.  Second it is contextual, available for certain audiences.  Third it is logical, reliable for its audiences.  Fourth, it is physical, cost effective.  An essay is like that.  It is a broad concept which as it is trimmed down appeals to an ever broader audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this post interesting because of something I encountered while teaching English in university.  In preparing students for composition I explained to them it is better to do more research than required, because it is easier to write down to an acceptable essay than up to it.</p>
<p>In &#8220;The Innovator&#8217;s Dilemma&#8221; the author, Christensen, lays out four steps that a product evolves through.  First, it is conceptual, a possibility.  Second it is contextual, available for certain audiences.  Third it is logical, reliable for its audiences.  Fourth, it is physical, cost effective.  An essay is like that.  It is a broad concept which as it is trimmed down appeals to an ever broader audience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maeda</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7331</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7331</guid>
					<description>The situation you are in, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawsofsimplicity.com/?p=55&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;context&lt;/a&gt; definitely changes things. Sitting on a beach too long and you might want to end up on 42nd Street, and vice-versa. We always want what we don't have (at least I do -- and am trying to break the bad habit). Regards, John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The situation you are in, the <a href="http://lawsofsimplicity.com/?p=55" rel="nofollow">context</a> definitely changes things. Sitting on a beach too long and you might want to end up on 42nd Street, and vice-versa. We always want what we don&#8217;t have (at least I do &#8212; and am trying to break the bad habit). Regards, John
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7318</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7318</guid>
					<description>Yes, the determination of which is better :-) more or less, has all to do with your context.  However, I but I find it interesting in your last paragraph that you mention it is &quot;much greater challenge in creating meaning from less, wouldn't you just say it is an individual's point of view.  Consider how you would feel (or the thoughts which come to mind) in these two venues: 42nd Street NY vs an idyllic beach setting.  I much prefer less!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the determination of which is better <img src='http://lawsofsimplicity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  more or less, has all to do with your context.  However, I but I find it interesting in your last paragraph that you mention it is &#8220;much greater challenge in creating meaning from less, wouldn&#8217;t you just say it is an individual&#8217;s point of view.  Consider how you would feel (or the thoughts which come to mind) in these two venues: 42nd Street NY vs an idyllic beach setting.  I much prefer less!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7316</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7316</guid>
					<description>Although the passionate feelings about &quot;more&quot;, the euphoria and the sense of lots to learn are obviously something we lean to, i think when working with &quot;less&quot; we should not try to emulate this feelings. As any euphorical state, the sense of invincibility produced by &quot;more&quot; is ephemeral (as described in your post). 
I believe that the spiritual state to be pursued when working with &quot;less&quot; has something to do with minimun efects, but highly persistent ones. It is about something that, by its simplicity, is always felt as new. Just like when it hails.
Congratulations for this blog,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the passionate feelings about &#8220;more&#8221;, the euphoria and the sense of lots to learn are obviously something we lean to, i think when working with &#8220;less&#8221; we should not try to emulate this feelings. As any euphorical state, the sense of invincibility produced by &#8220;more&#8221; is ephemeral (as described in your post).<br />
I believe that the spiritual state to be pursued when working with &#8220;less&#8221; has something to do with minimun efects, but highly persistent ones. It is about something that, by its simplicity, is always felt as new. Just like when it hails.<br />
Congratulations for this blog,
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7309</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/06/23/meaningfulless-meaningfulmore/#comment-7309</guid>
					<description>This makes me think of something Blaise Pascal once wrote to a close friend... &quot;I'm sorry this letter is so long, I didn't have time to make it shorter.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes me think of something Blaise Pascal once wrote to a close friend&#8230; &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry this letter is so long, I didn&#8217;t have time to make it shorter.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
