<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digitally Green</title>
	<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/</link>
	<description>simplicity resources for design, business, technology, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Judy Wallace, Health Patio</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-8015</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-8015</guid>
					<description>Terms like technowaste really catch my eye - in fact the whole post is brilliant. I enjoyed reading it and I borrowed the conclusion for use on my own blog. :-) Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terms like technowaste really catch my eye - in fact the whole post is brilliant. I enjoyed reading it and I borrowed the conclusion for use on my own blog. <img src='http://lawsofsimplicity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks for sharing!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: maeda</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-7996</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-7996</guid>
					<description>Made those edits you requested, Best, John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made those edits you requested, Best, John
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-7995</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-7995</guid>
					<description>I am so sorry, but when in my previous comment says &quot;meaningful&quot; it should say &quot;meaningless&quot;. If you rather edit my comment, I would appreciate it. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so sorry, but when in my previous comment says &#8220;meaningful&#8221; it should say &#8220;meaningless&#8221;. If you rather edit my comment, I would appreciate it. Thank you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: martin</title>
		<link>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-7991</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lawsofsimplicity.com/2007/11/18/digitally-green/#comment-7991</guid>
					<description>I´ve been writing a lot on this subject in my own blog, and curiously I've been relating this issue with some ideas from your Laws of Simplicity book: I relate this to economy, the way my parents taught me (not precisely the one you can learn in Wall Street) as a kind of synonym of simplicity: not to get something expensive if it is not made to last (a law not included in the book), not to have two things if one can do the job (1.-reduce), learn to master one thing and only buy a new one, requiring new mastery, if really needed (4.-Learn). Never consider something disposable just because you're tired of it (Law 11 (proposed): Responsibility, simplicity is at first an Ethic, that's later materialized in some useful object. A very simple object or device is meaning&lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; without the corresponding state of the mind. Your book is great and clarifying from the start, when it says Design, Technology, Business and Life.).
There's plenty more from my peasant family, with a knowledge so much like the one exposed in your book, but let's keep it simple. 
Congratulations and thank you for making contemporary an everlasting subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I´ve been writing a lot on this subject in my own blog, and curiously I&#8217;ve been relating this issue with some ideas from your Laws of Simplicity book: I relate this to economy, the way my parents taught me (not precisely the one you can learn in Wall Street) as a kind of synonym of simplicity: not to get something expensive if it is not made to last (a law not included in the book), not to have two things if one can do the job (1.-reduce), learn to master one thing and only buy a new one, requiring new mastery, if really needed (4.-Learn). Never consider something disposable just because you&#8217;re tired of it (Law 11 (proposed): Responsibility, simplicity is at first an Ethic, that&#8217;s later materialized in some useful object. A very simple object or device is meaning<i>less</i> without the corresponding state of the mind. Your book is great and clarifying from the start, when it says Design, Technology, Business and Life.).<br />
There&#8217;s plenty more from my peasant family, with a knowledge so much like the one exposed in your book, but let&#8217;s keep it simple.<br />
Congratulations and thank you for making contemporary an everlasting subject.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
